高级检索
毕冰清, 赵卓, 刘芮同, 闫美霖, 李述刚. 传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价的指标体系[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2024, 15(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2024.02.012
引用本文: 毕冰清, 赵卓, 刘芮同, 闫美霖, 李述刚. 传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价的指标体系[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2024, 15(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2024.02.012
BI Bing Qing, ZHAO Zhuo, LIU Rui Tong, YAN Mei Lin, LI Shu Gang. Index system for evaluating medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in communities under the background of infectious disease epidemic[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2024, 15(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2024.02.012
Citation: BI Bing Qing, ZHAO Zhuo, LIU Rui Tong, YAN Mei Lin, LI Shu Gang. Index system for evaluating medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in communities under the background of infectious disease epidemic[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2024, 15(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2024.02.012

传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价的指标体系

Index system for evaluating medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in communities under the background of infectious disease epidemic

  • 摘要:
    目的 探索制定用于评价传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价的指标体系,以期为做好孕产妇健康服务工作提供参考。
    方法 应用德尔菲法向30名专家进行两轮咨询,确定传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价的三级指标体系,并应用层次分析法计算各指标的权重。
    结果 两轮专家咨询的问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数为0.9,重要性系数分别为0.557和0.571,可操作性专家意见协调系数分别为0.425和0.447,重要性和可操作性的肯德尔系数的统计学检验均具有统计学意义(均P < 0.001)。最终确定了传染病流行背景下社区孕产妇就医保障评价三级指标体系,包括预防与准备、应急响应、评价与总结、能力提升与储备4个一级指标(权重分别为0.2559、0.2536、0.2541、0.2364)、10个二级指标及29个三级指标。
    结论 预防与准备的指标权重在社区孕产妇就医保障评价三级指标体系中占比较大,提示基层卫生机构要做好孕产妇的日常就医保障工作,预防与准备尤为重要,应进一步加强孕产妇信息登记、风险评估、疾病筛查、健康教育等工作,在重大传染病发生时才能更好地应对与保障孕产妇的就医。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the establishment of an evaluation index system for medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in communities under the background of infectious disease epidemic, in order to provide evidence for maternal health services.
    Methods A total of 30 experts were consulted for two rounds by Delphi method to determine the three-level indicator system for evaluating the medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in the community under the background of infectious disease epidemic. Chromatography analysis method used to calculate the weight of each indicator.
    Results The questionnaire response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 100%, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.9, and importance coefficients of 0.557 and 0.571, respectively. The coordination coefficients operability of expert opinions were 0.425, and 0.447, respectively. The statistical tests for the Kendall coefficients of importance and operability were statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Finally, a three-level indicator system for the evaluation of medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in infectious disease epidemic communities was set up and included 4 primary indicators, such as preventing and preparation, emergency response, evaluation and summary, and ability enhancement and reserve (with weights of 0.255 9, 0.253 6, 0.254 1, and 0.236 4, respectively), 10 secondary indicators, and 29 tertiary indicators.
    Conclusion The weight of prevention and preparation indicators accounts for a relatively bigger proportion in the three-level indicator system for evaluating medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in the community. This suggests that grassroots health institutions should focus on preventing and preparing for medical security of them in daily work. Information registration, risk assessment, disease screening, and health education, etc. should be strengthened in order to ensure better respondence and medical security of pregnant women and puerpera in the endemic of major infectious diseases.

     

/

返回文章
返回