高级检索

2018年某小学连续2起流感暴发疫情中流感疫苗对甲型H3N2的保护效果分析

Analysis of protective effect of influenza vaccine against type A H3N2 in two consecutive Influenza outbreaks in a primary school in 2018

  • 摘要: 目的 了解2018年北京市秋冬季接种的四价流感疫苗对甲型H3N2流感的保护效果。方法 收集2018年12月北京市海淀区某小学连续发生的2起H3N2流感暴发疫情调查资料(含流感疫苗接种情况和实验室检测报告)的数据进行分析,计算保护率。结果 2起疫情罹患率分别为44.63%(54/121)和25.40%(32/126);H3N2核酸阳性率分别为77.27%(34/44)和70.83%(17/24),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.343,P=0.558);流感疫苗对甲型H3N2亚型的保护率分别为12.32%和-11.35%,疫情1、2接种组和未接种组的发病率差别均无统计学意义(χ2=0.204,P=0.652;χ2<0.001,P=1.000)。结论 2018年北京市秋冬季接种的四价流感疫苗对甲型H3N2亚型的保护效果不明显,流感防控不能完全依赖疫苗,还需多种形式的综合措施。

     

    Abstract: Objective To understand the protective effect of tetravalent influenza vaccine inoculated in autumn and winter of 2018 in Beijing on influenza A H3N2.Methods Data of 2 successive H3N2 influenza outbreaks in a primary school in Haidian District in December 2018(including influenza vaccination and laboratory test reports) were collected and analyzed to calculate the protection rate.Results The attack rate of 2 outbreaks was 44.63%(54/121) and 25.40%(32/126),respectively,and the positive rates of H3N2 nucleic acid were 77.27%(34/44) and 70.83%(17/24),respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 outbreaks(χ2= 0.343,P=0.558). The protective rates of influenza vaccine against H3N2 were 12.32% and-11.35%,respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of H3N2 between the vaccination group and the non-vaccination group in outbreak 1 and 2(χ2= 0.204,P=0.652; χ2<0.001,P=1.000).Conclusions The protective effect of tetravalent influenza vaccine inoculated in autumn and winter of 2018 in Beijing on influenza A H3N2 is not obvious. Influenza prevention and control cannot rely entirely on vaccines,but also need a variety of comprehensive measures.

     

/

返回文章
返回