高级检索

孕晚期B族链球菌定植对妊娠结局及新生儿感染的影响分析

Analysis of the effect of Group B Streptococcus colonization on pregnancy outcome and Neonatal infection in the third trimester of pregnancy

  • 摘要: 目的 分析孕晚期B族链球菌(group B streptococcus,GBS)定植对妊娠结局及新生儿感染的影响。方法 选取2016年9月1日-2017年8月31日在东莞市第八人民医院分娩且行妊娠晚期生殖道GBS筛查的3554例孕产妇为研究对象,根据筛查结果分为GBS定植组(241例)和无GBS定植组(3313例),回顾性分析两组孕产妇的年龄、剖宫产率、异常孕产史、产前发热等一般情况,新生儿感染的发病情况及预后。结果 ①与无GBS定植组比较,GBS定植组母亲年龄较大(29.3 vs 28.6,P=0.048),异常孕产史(包括自然流产、异位妊娠、因胎儿畸形行引产术、死胎)较多(10.0%vs 3.9%,P=0.000);产前发热发病率较高(2.1%vs 0.3%,P=0.002),胎膜早破发病率较高(27.8%vs 21.0%,P=0.015),绒毛膜羊膜炎发病率较高(19.5%vs 14.7%,P=0.05),较多应用产时抗生素预防性治疗(Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis,IAP)(15.8%vs 6.8%,P=0.000)。②与无GBS定植组比较,GBS定植组新生儿败血症发病率较高(2.5%vs 0.8%,P=0.025),其中有2名新生儿血培养出GBS,这2名患儿中有1名胃液也检出GBS,新生儿肺炎发病率较高(4.1%vs 1.4%,P=0.005),新生儿窒息发病率较高(3.3%vs 1.4%,P=0.025);GBS定植组有1名新生儿发生化脓性脑膜炎,其血培养及脑脊液培养均为大肠埃希菌,经抗感染等治疗后治愈出院,无GBS定植组无化脓性脑膜炎病例;新生儿结膜炎发病率两组比较无差异。GBS定植者其新生儿发生GBS之外的其他病原菌感染发病率较无GBS定植者明显增高。结论 孕晚期GBS定植可提高不良妊娠结局的发生风险,导致新生儿GBS感染率增加,临床应注意筛查警惕。

     

    Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization on pregnancy outcome and neonatal infection.Methods 3554 pregnant women who delivered in our hospital from September 1, 2016 to August 31, 2017 and underwent GBS screening in the third trimester of pregnancy were divided into GBS colonization group (241 cases) and non-GBS colonization group (3313 cases) according to the screening results. Age, cesarean section rate, abnormal pregnancy history, antenatal fever, incidence and prognosis of neonatal infection in the two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results ①Compared with the non-GBS colonization group, the pregnant women of GBS colonization group were older (29.3 vs 28.6, P=0.048), with more abnormal pregnancy history (including spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, induced abortion due to fetal malformation, stillbirth) (10.0% vs 3.9%, P=0.000), higher incidence of prenatal fever (2.1% vs 0.3%, P=0.002), premature rupture of membranes (27.8% vs 21.0%, P=0.015), and chorioamniotic meningitis (19.5% vs 14.7%, P=0.05). Preventive treatment with intrapartum antibiotics prophylaxis (IAP) (15.8% vs 6.8%, P=0.000) was more frequently used in GBS colonization group than non-GBS colonization group. ② The incidence of neonatal sepsis in GBS colonization group was higher than that in non-GBS colonization group (2.5% vs 0.8%, P=0.025). GBS was detected in 2 neonatal blood cultures. One of the 2 neonates also detected GBS in gastric juice. The incidence of neonatal pneumonia was higher (4. 1% vs 1.4%, P=0.005), and the incidence of neonatal asphyxia was higher (3.3% vs 1.4%). There was one neonate with purulent meningitis in GBS colonization group,. Both of their blood culture and cerebrospinal fluid culture were Escherichia coli. They were cured and discharged after anti-infection treatment. There was no case of purulent meningitis in non-GBS colonization group. There was no difference in the incidence of neonatal conjunctivitis between the two groups. The incidence of pathogenic bacteria infection in neonates with GBS colonization was significantly higher than that without GBS colonization.Conclusion GBS colonization in the third trimester can increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, leading to an increase in neonatal GBS infection rate, and clinical should be vigilant.

     

/

返回文章
返回