高级检索
钟爱明, 董波, 张宏玉. 初次剖宫产术后再次阴道分娩成功的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2019, 10(6): 28-31. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2019.06.005
引用本文: 钟爱明, 董波, 张宏玉. 初次剖宫产术后再次阴道分娩成功的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2019, 10(6): 28-31. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2019.06.005
ZHONG Ai-ming, DONG Bo, ZHANG Hong-yu. Analysis of influencing factors on the success of vaginal delivery after primary cesarean section[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2019, 10(6): 28-31. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2019.06.005
Citation: ZHONG Ai-ming, DONG Bo, ZHANG Hong-yu. Analysis of influencing factors on the success of vaginal delivery after primary cesarean section[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2019, 10(6): 28-31. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2019.06.005

初次剖宫产术后再次阴道分娩成功的影响因素分析

Analysis of influencing factors on the success of vaginal delivery after primary cesarean section

  • 摘要: 目的 回顾性比较初次剖宫产术后再次阴道分娩(VBAC)成功者与失败转剖宫产者,发现影响成功率的临床因素。方法 初产剖宫产术后符合试产条件者(TOLAC)186例纳入研究对象,严密观察下进行阴道试产。按VBAC者与失败者分为两组,比较两组间一般情况与临床结局指标。结果 TOLAC 186例中,VBAC 150人(80.64%),失败36人,不完全子宫破裂2例(1.07%),新生儿窒息0例;会阴侧切21例(14%)。VBAC与失败者比较,两组在年龄、孕周、术前估计胎儿体重和真实体重、子宫下段的厚度等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。VBAC组宫颈评分高于失败组(t=2.184,P=0.030);VBAC组缩宫素引产28%(42/150)低于失败者组52.8%(19/36),差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.087,P=0.004)。Logistic回归分析发现缩宫素引产是VBAC失败的危险因素,增加2.89倍风险(95%CI 1.282~6.539)。子宫下段的厚度正常值范围在(1.40±1.15) mm,最小值为0.12 mm,25%百分位数0.2~0.3 mm。结论 在系统严密的临床管理下,TOLAC是相对安全的,VBAC成功率可达80%以上,子宫破裂的几率1.07%,无新生儿窒息和严重产后出血,无切除子宫病例。自然临产是VBAC成功的重要因素,宫颈评分越高,成功的几率越高,缩宫素引产增加失败的几率。子宫下段厚度对预测子宫破裂没有意义。

     

    Abstract: Objective A retrospective comparison of the pregnant women with vaginal delivery(VBAC) and cesarean section after primary cesarean section was conducted to find out the clinical factors affecting the success rate.Methods 186 cases with primary cesarean section met the criteria of TOLAC were included in the study. TOLAC was observed under strict clinical protocol. According to the patients with VBAC and the patients with cesarean section,the patients were divided into two groups,and the general situation and clinical outcome indexes were compared between the two groups.Results Among 186 cases for TOLAC,150 cases had fulfilled VBAC(80.64%),36 patients turned to cesarean section,2 cases had incomplete uterine rupture(1.07%) and none had neonatal asphyxia. There were 21 cases(14%) had lateral perineum section. There were no statistic difference between two groups in age,gestational age,preoperative estimation of fetal weight and real weight and the thickness of the lower segment layer of uterine. The VBAC group had higher Bishop cervical score(t=2.184 P=0.030).; and fewer oxytocin induced labor 28%(42/150) than those in the failure group 52.8%(19/36)(χ2= 8.087,P=8.087). Logistic regression analysis found thatoxytocin induced labor increased the risk by 2.89 times for failed VBAC,(95%CI 1.282-6.539). The normal range of thickness of the lower segment layer of the uterus was around(1.40 ± 1.15),the minimum value was 0.12 mm,and the 25% percentile was 0.2-0.3 mm.Conclusion Under the rigorous clinical management system,TOLAC is relatively safe practice,the success rate of VBAC in this study was more than 80%,uterine rupture rate was 1.07%,no serious neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage,no cases of hysterectomy.Natural in labor is an important factor for the success of VBAC. The higher the cervical score,the higher the VBAC rate. The thickness of the lower segment layer of the uterus is not sensitive for predicting rupture of the uterus.

     

/

返回文章
返回