高级检索
沈芳, 张倩, 袁全莲, 张良芬, 赵温, 马祥君, 彭振耀. 2018年北京市海淀区新生儿听力筛查现况分析[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2021, 12(1): 24-26,39. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2021.01.006
引用本文: 沈芳, 张倩, 袁全莲, 张良芬, 赵温, 马祥君, 彭振耀. 2018年北京市海淀区新生儿听力筛查现况分析[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2021, 12(1): 24-26,39. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2021.01.006
SHEN Fang, ZHANG Qian, YUAN Quan Lian, ZHANG Liang Fen, ZHAO Wen, MA Xiang Jun, PENG Zhen Yao. Analysis of neonatal hearing screening in Haidian District of Beijing,2018[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2021, 12(1): 24-26,39. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2021.01.006
Citation: SHEN Fang, ZHANG Qian, YUAN Quan Lian, ZHANG Liang Fen, ZHAO Wen, MA Xiang Jun, PENG Zhen Yao. Analysis of neonatal hearing screening in Haidian District of Beijing,2018[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEALTH, 2021, 12(1): 24-26,39. DOI: 10.19757/j.cnki.issn1674-7763.2021.01.006

2018年北京市海淀区新生儿听力筛查现况分析

Analysis of neonatal hearing screening in Haidian District of Beijing,2018

  • 摘要: 目的 了解北京市海淀区2018年助产机构新生儿听力筛查现况。方法 对海淀区2018年助产机构上报的产科听力筛查报表和新生儿危重病房(NICU)上报的听力筛查的资料进行统计学分析。结果 2018年海淀区活产总数35 432人,完成听力初筛人数34 710人,听力筛查初筛率为97. 96%,初筛未通过率为7. 25%。复筛率为82. 64%,复筛未通过率为18. 74%,复筛耳声发射(Otoacoustic emission,OAE)和自动听性脑干反应(Automatic auditory brainstem response,AABR)使用率为51. 76%。新生儿NICU组筛查通过率为70. 67%;产科进行听筛的新生儿组初筛通过率为92. 75%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0. 05)。398名未通过复筛的新生儿经北京市听力诊断中心听性脑干诱发电位、声导抗诊断性检查,最后确诊听力障碍202人,听力障碍发生率5. 08‰;NICU听力障碍发生率4. 03%。结论 北京市海淀区新生儿听力筛查初筛率和复筛率达到指标要求,但有待进一步提高。应积极推进助产机构开展AABR联合OAE筛查,通过加强健康教育和护理干预提高复诊依从性。加强对有听力损失高危因素的新生儿进行早期诊断、干预和随访。

     

    Abstract: Objective To learn the current situation of newborn hearing screening in midwifery institutions in Haidian District in2018. Method The hearing screening data reported by obstetric department and neonatal intensive care unit(UICU) in midwifery institutions in Haidian District in 2018 was statistically analyzed. Result The total number of live births in Haidian District in 2018 was 35,432, and 34,710 newborn received the hearing screening. The hearing primary screening rate was 97.96%. The failure rate of primary screening was 7.25%. The secondary rate was 82. 64%, the failure rate of secondary was 18. 74%. The utilization rate of OAE and AABR was 51.76%. The pass rate of screening in the NICU group was 70.67%, and that in the normal neonatal group was92.75%. The difference was statistically significant(P< 0. 05). 398 newborns who failed to pass the secondary were examined by auditory brainstem evoked potential(ABEP) and acoustic immittance(EI) in Beijing Audiological Diagnostic Center. Among them,202 newborns were finally diagnosed as hearing impairment. The incidence of hearing impairment was 5.08‰ and 4.03% in normal neonatal group and NICU group, respectively. Conclusion The primary screening rate and secondary rate of neonatal hearing screening reached the goal of our district, but need to be further improved. Midwifery institutions should be actively promoted to carry out AABR combined with OAE screening. Through the compliance of return clinic visit should be improved by strengthening health education and nursing intervention. It is necessary to strengthen the early diagnosis, intervent and follow-up the newborns with high risk factors of hearing loss.

     

/

返回文章
返回