高级检索

妊娠期糖尿病与双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎不良围产结局的关系

Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse perinatal outcome of dichorionic diamniotic sac twins

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨妊娠期糖尿病对双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎围产期母儿不良妊娠结局的影响,以期为临床规范管理和提出更有针对性的治疗措施提供借鉴,以减少围产期不良妊娠结局的发生。
    方法 回顾性收集2018年1月 — 2022年10月在广东省深圳市宝安区妇幼保健院产科分娩的516例双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠孕妇的临床资料。其中,258例糖尿病孕妇为病例组,另258例糖代谢正常的孕妇为对照组。比较两组孕期母体的并发症、围产期母儿结局,以及孕期血糖干预后对病例组部分孕妇妊娠结局的影响。
    结果 病例组孕妇的重度子痫前期、早产及小于胎龄儿的发生率远高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),其余方面的母体并发症和围产期母儿结局两组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。病例组的贫血发生率低于对照组(P < 0.05),但重度贫血需要输血的病例占比与对照组的比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。进一步对双胎妊娠期糖尿病孕妇进行血糖干预,病例组中接受血糖干预治疗的有140例,另118例孕妇未接受血糖干预。接受干预者与未接受干预者相比,重度子痫前期、胎膜早破、宫内感染、早产的发生比例较低,且差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。
    结论 妊娠期糖尿病除了会增加双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠重度子痫前期、早产、小于胎龄儿的风险外,没有增加其他并发症及围产期母儿风险。对双胎妊娠期糖尿病孕妇进行血糖干预,可降低重度子痫前期、胎膜早破、宫内感染及早产的发生。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the influence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on perinatal adverse pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic diamniotic twins, so as to provide evidence for clinical standardized management and targeted treatment and reduce the occurrence of adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes.
    Methods  Clinical data of 516 pregnant women with dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies from January 2018 to October 2022 who delivered babies at Shenzhen Baoan Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Guangdong were collected retrospectively. Among them, 258 pregnant women with diabetes were case group, and 258 pregnant women with normal glucose metabolism were control group. The pregnancy complications, the perinatal maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between 2 groups, and the impact of gestational blood glucose intervention on pregnancy outcomes of some women in case group were compared pre and post invention.
    Results  The incidence of severe preeclampsia, premature birth, and small for gestational age in the case group was much higher than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The other aspects of maternal complications and perinatal maternal and fetal outcomes were not different between 2 groups (all P > 0.05). The incidence of anemia in case group was lower than that in control group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of cases requiring blood transfusion for severe anemia between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Further intervention on twin pregnant women with diabetes was carried out. In the case group, 140 cases received blood glucose intervention, and 118 cases did not. Compared with those who did not receive intervention, the incidence of severe preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infections, and premature birth was lower among those who did it (all P < 0.05).
    Conclusion GDM does not increase the risk of other pregnancy complications, perinatal maternal and infant except for severe preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age in dichorionic diamniotic twins. Blood glucose intervention among twin pregnant women with diabetes can reduce the incidence of severe preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infection and premature delivery.

     

/

返回文章
返回